Monday, November 17, 2025

Tonight's Movie: The Trouble With Harry (1955)

I've been gradually working my way through a small stack of films I've never seen directed by the great Alfred Hitchcock.

The autumn season made it the perfect time to finally check out THE TROUBLE WITH HARRY (1955), which was shot in Vermont in the fall of 1954.

I'd put off seeing this film as I'm not the world's biggest fan of Shirley MacLaine, plus I'd heard it was "offbeat" -- I mean, it's focused almost entirely around a dead body?!

Well, I've now seen it and can say it was very definitely offbeat, but in the most delightful ways. I was almost surprised that I found it quite entertaining, even heartwarming. It sounds absurd to describe it that way, but Hitchcock really accomplished something unique with this film.

And more than that, Shirley MacLaine was perfect for this role, and some of her line deliveries made me laugh out loud, which I don't often do when watching movies alone at home. I was actually glad she was in the cast.

The plot, such as it is, concerns various people in a small rural village stumbling -- some of them quite literally -- over a body on a hill outside town.

The people who come in contact with the body include a retired sailor, Albert Wiles (Edmund Gwenn); a handsome young artist named Sam (John Forsythe); a young mother, Jennifer (MacLaine), and her little boy Arnie (Jerry Mathers); and an older woman, Ivy (Mildred Natwick), for whom the discovery of the body leads to unexpected late-life romance.

None of these folks are particularly concerned or disturbed to find a dead man in their midst; indeed, the identity of the corpse comes as a relief to Jennifer, as he's a difficult person from her past.

But who killed him, and why? What should be done with the body? And will the Deputy Sheriff (Royal Dano) unfairly suspect one of the townspeople is the murderer?

It's a bizarre little 99-minute movie about absolutely lovely people with a problem on their hands. I was amused that at various times it reminded me of "feel good" films as diverse as CHRISTMAS IN JULY (1940) and DONOVAN'S REEF (1963).

The CHRISTMAS IN JULY connection comes when a millionaire (Parker Fennelly) stumbles across Sam's art; rather than asking for money, Sam has each of his friends (including Mildred Dunnock as a storekeeper) name what they'd like most before he whispers his own request to the man. Each person wants something simple yet meaningful.

THE TROUBLE WITH HARRY also reminded me of DONOVAN'S REEF insofar as it's what I think of as a near-plotless "hangout" movie with a fun group of people. It's even got occasional John Ford player Natwick in the cast!

And how fun is it that Hitchcock utilized Edmund Gwenn 15 years after my favorite Hitchcock movie, FOREIGN CORRESPONDENT (1940)?

The clever script was written by John Michael Hayes from a novel by Jack Trevor Story. Among the funny quotes was MacLaine's deadpan "He looked exactly the same when he was alive, only he was vertical."

Vermont was filmed in its autumnal glory by Robert Burks, with a superb Bernard Herrmann score to accent the action.

I watched THE TROUBLE WITH HARRY on Blu-ray.

Anyone open to trying something completely different from the norm should check out THE TROUBLE WITH HARRY...and this is definitely the perfect time of year to watch it.

Among the Hitchcock films remaining in my stack: LIFEBOAT (1944), UNDER CAPRICORN (1949), THE MAN WHO KNEW TOO MUCH (1956), and TOPAZ (1969).


1 Comments:

Blogger Walter S. said...

Laura, it is a delight reading your wonderful write-up of Alfred Hitchcock's THE TROUBLE WITH HARRY(filmed 1954, released 1955). I'm so glad you liked this whimsical dark comedy masterpiece. Yes, too me it's a masterpiece amongst other Hitchcock masterpieces. This one is Hitchcock's out and out comedy and I think it's funny in an absurd way, which I think works. I first recall viewing this movie on THE ABC WEDNESDAY NIGHT MOVIE in 1967 and again in 1968. This delightful movie stuck in my mind for years afterward.

I like what you wrote about THE TROUBLE WITH HARRY being offbeat and its worth repeating, " it was very definitely offbeat, but in the most delightful ways. I was almost surprised that I found it quite entertaining, even heartwarming. It sounds absurd to describe it that way, but Hitchcock really accomplished something unique with this film." Yes, I think you hit the nail on the head by thinking that Hitchcock accomplished a uniqueness here. I think it is most certainly a "Unique" movie.

Hitchcock owned the rights to THE TROUBLE WITH HARRY, and he withheld it from public showing for years. After his death Universal bought the rights to the movie along with three others. Universal sent these movies back out to movie theaters in 1984 and on VHS tape in 1985. I finally viewed it on The Movie Channel(TMC) in 1985, and I thought it was as good as I remembered.

From what I've read THE TROUBLE WITH HARRY didn't do that well at the box office in its first release in 1955, but it did better on its re-release in 1963. Why? I think on its initial release the public went in thinking they were going to view a suspenseful thriller, but it wasn't. The second time around the public were much more used to the dark humor of some of his quirky television shows by way of ALFRED HITCHCOCK PRESENTS(1955-62) and THE ALFRED HITCHCOCK HOUR(1962-65), so the public probably appreciated it more in that vein.

Look forward to your next write-up.

8:21 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

‹Older