Saturday, February 19, 2022

Tonight's Movie: Death on the Nile (2022)

A little over four years ago I saw Kenneth Branagh's version of MURDER ON THE ORIENT EXPRESS (2017). Branagh directed and also starred as Agatha Christie's master detective Hercule Poirot.

I quite enjoyed that film, more than many critics, and have been looking forward to Branagh's version of DEATH ON THE NILE (2022) ever since. I certainly never dreamed it would take so long, as the release date was pushed back multiple times due to COVID restrictions, but it's now in theaters at long last.

I enjoyed DEATH ON THE NILE quite well; while not a great film, it's solid and enjoyable, just like its predecessor. In fact, I'd venture to say that I actually liked it more than the 1978 version, which I reviewed in 2020.

DEATH ON THE NILE begins with a nice old-fashioned feel thanks to the 20th Century-Fox fanfare, complete with the CinemaScope extension theme music. There's a modern change to go with the classic music, however, as the company is now called 20th Century Studios.

The film begins with a World War I prologue which helps explain Poirot's mustache -- which, it should be noted, is not as out of control crazy-looking as it was in ORIENT EXPRESS. It was nice not to be distracted in that regard.

After the prologue we then move forward in time to the story of Simon (Armie Hammer, THE SOCIAL NETWORK), who jilts his fiancee Jacqueline (Emma Mackey) for her good friend, heiress Linnet Ridgeway (Gal Gadot, WONDER WOMAN).

The newlyweds take a post-wedding cruise down the Nile, followed by Jacqueline; also on board is the great detective Hercule Poirot (Branagh) and a variety of passengers include singer Salome (Sophie Okonedo) and her daughter Rosalie (Letitia Wright, BLACK PANTHER); Poirot's friend Bouc (Tom Bateman, who also played the character in ORIENT EXPRESS) and his artist mother Euphemia (Annette Bening); and a doctor (Russell Brand).

This being an Agatha Christie story, it isn't long before someone ends up dead, and then someone else, and then... It's up to Poirot to solve the mystery and hopefully save other lives.

Those familiar with the Christie story or the original film will recognize that some characters have been changed, renamed, or are missing, which also allows for more diverse casting; I felt that the changes worked well, and the basic storyline regarding Linnet's marriage and the following murders on the Nile is still there.

Truth to tell, one of this film's virtues is its relatively streamlined telling, clocking in at 127 minutes instead of the 1978 film's 140. Had I been the editor I would have also cut out Poirot's prologue and epilogue to give the film an even crisper running time; it would have been worth eliminating a bit of character shading in order to achieve a running time under two hours.

Regarding character development, I did feel that the 1978 version tended to move the "player game pieces" from place to place simply to unlock the puzzle rather than give us much in the way of depth; the characters were there to serve Christie's story. To be sure, the sheer number of people in the cast makes it hard to delve too deeply into character and motivations, but I felt like the new film does a better job conveying emotions and mood, particularly with regard to Simon's sultry relationships with Jacqueline and Linnet. (Almost too sultry, as Simon engages in some fairly explicit dancing early on with both ladies.)

I particularly liked Gadot as the regal Linnet, who is clearly used to having her way in all things yet remains sympathetic -- certainly more so than Lois Chiles in the previous film.

Branagh is again fine as Poirot, though his rapid-fire announcement of the solution to the mystery was almost hard to follow, given the accompanying accent! This is a film I will watch again someday on Blu-ray with the captions on.

Angela Lansbury's writer of the previous version is a singer this time around, played by Okonedo, and despite the related story and character changes, Okonedo is one of the film's best, mostly lively assets. I also liked the new character played by Annette Bening, who seems to be channeling her very best Ida Lupino vibes; it works very well.

Most of the cast is fine, but frankly I feel the film could have used more star power in roles such as Linnet's financial adviser (Ali Fazal) and maid (Rose Leslie) or Mrs. Van Schuyler (Jennifer Saunders) and her companion (Dawn French). The actors are all adequate and have had successful careers, but they're not especially memorable; additionally, part of the fun of a film like this is a star-studded cast, and I would have liked to see a little more of that type of notable casting. Fans of any of the noted actors may have a different take on that!

The cruise ship is gorgeous, with its beveled glass windows and white and silver decor; the beautiful setting adds a great deal to the film's mood and is a definite strong point. Given how good the main set is, some of the movie's incredibly obvious CGI work is therefore rather surprising. However, if one looks at it as being on a level with back projections of the classic film era, I suppose it's a step up.

The music is by Patrick Doyle, who scored MURDER ON THE ORIENT EXPRESS and has worked on other films I like, including CINDERELLA (2015). Also like MURDER ON THE ORIENT EXPRESS, the screenplay is by Michael Green, with cinematography by Haris Zambarloukos.

Parental Advisory: This film is rated PG-13 for some suggestive scenes and dialogue, along with mild gore.

A trailer is here.

DEATH ON THE NILE may not be a great film, but this is a solid, attractive telling of a classic story. I found it quite a pleasant afternoon at the movies and would definitely watch it again.

12 Comments:

Blogger Barry Lane said...

I saw some of Branagh's Murder on the Orient Express and then tossed it. That was my limit, with his make-up, accent and heavy-handed production. Your points that were negative regarding the 1978 Death On the Nile certainly make sense, but to lose Peter Ustinov, Mia Farrow, I.S. Johar, George Kennedy, and especially Simon MacCorkindale are if not earth-shattering, sad. Is Nino Rota's score gone too? Probably.

I love Ustinov personally and his performance. Look for Evil Under the Sun, works like a charm.

7:27 PM  
Blogger Laura said...

I liked the Ustinov version of EVIL UNDER THE SUN better than his '78 DEATH ON THE NILE, in part because it had better editing! Ustinov was fine but also I really enjoy Branagh. Branagh did receive deserved criticism for the over-the-top, distracting mustache in ORIENT EXPRESS and toned it down for DEATH ON THE NILE, and the movie is better for it.

This new version has a nice score by Patrick Doyle, who I feel is one of the better film composers of the current era.

Best wishes,
Laura

7:39 PM  
Blogger Lee R said...

I became a real fan of Poirot after seeing all episodes of the TV British show with David Suchet, he is still the very best of all the Poirots I've seen. Just as Jeremy Brett defined Sherlock, so did Suchet's Poirot. I enjoyed Ustinov as Poirot but really I would never call him the definitive Poirot as I would call Suchet.

Sorry to say I really did NOT enjoy Branagh as Poirot his mustache was ridiculous and his speech incomprehensible. He didn't even behave as Poirot would have. I have not seen the new Branagh movie yet and I will see it as I still want to see it just because it's a Poirot mystery. The last time I expected much more this time I'm not expecting much so maybe it'll be better simply by not expecting much. By the way I read above that Dawn French and Jennifer Saunders are in this movie, they are the famous duo for their British show French & Saunders and Jennifer was the star of Absolutely Fabulous. So pairing them in this movie was a bit of a reunion.

12:02 AM  
Blogger Jerry Entract said...

Like the previous film I will probably wait until this comes on TV to see it. Having read many of the Poirot books Peter Ustinov was never right for Poirot and Branagh even less so, playing Poirot at times more like a modern action hero - quite wrong.
Maybe I would feel differently had not the perfect Poirot been enacted by David Suchet. He worked very hard to get it as Mrs Christie wrote the character and went on to film every book and short story about the famous detective over more than 20 years.

Times change and films now have to be unnecessarily long, take account of diversity whether appropriate or not and move at breath-taking speed lest the film should lose the watcher's brief attention-span.

Thanks for reviewing this new film, Laura, which I will get to see no doubt eventually.

12:51 AM  
Anonymous Barry Lane said...

Jerry,
A series of astute comments. Right, all the way.

Barry

7:47 AM  
Blogger Jerry Entract said...

I remember that you are also a Suchet as Poirot fan, Barry.

8:49 AM  
Blogger Lee R said...

Nice to see Jerry here as we have talked before on Toby's 50's Westerns message board. There I was known as Johnny Guitar but Wordpress doesn't recognize me as that anymore so now I'm back to LeeR as I am here.

But yes, as I said above Branagh doesn't even act like Poirot would have and for that matter neither really does Ustinov (though Ustinov's portrayal is still amusing). I will also wait for the DVD or see it on TV as I haven't been to a theater to see a movie since I saw Death Wish 2. How's that for a dry spell? I like seeing movies in my own rocking chair not surrounded by noisy popcorn chewers.

I do have an idea though, for the next big production Poirot movie why not get (while the man is still alive) the definitive Poirot himself, Suchet, to do it. He may not want to as his own productions were all pretty lavish themselves, but I'd sure look forward to a big movie budget version of a Poirot movie with Suchet. Now that would be something.

10:02 AM  
Blogger Jerry Entract said...

Yes, nice to see you on here again too, Lee. I follow several blogs daily even if I don't have anything useful to add and wherever I am - at home or abroad.

11:05 AM  
Blogger Laura said...

Thank you all so much for the great discussion! You collectively know a great deal more than I do about Poirot (especially as I've not yet enjoyed the Suchet version), so I enjoyed reading all the above comments and learning more!

As Lee points out and as I mentioned in my review, Branagh's accent does get the better of him at the times. I had no issues understanding most of the soundtrack but when he started reeling off his solution I was definitely not getting every word LOL.

Thanks again --
Best wishes,
Laura

2:42 PM  
Blogger Seth said...

DEATH is currently at the local theater, and I just rediscovered a gift card, so maybe this week I’ll make it the first new movie I’ve seen in the theater in years (as in, since even before 2020).…

4:00 PM  
Blogger Laura said...

If you decide to go see it I hope you'll find it as pleasant an experience as I did, Seth. Let me know your thought on it!

Best wishes,
Laura

7:02 PM  
Blogger Margot Shelby said...

I think I have rarely despised anything more than Branagh's version of Orient Express. Frankly, it enraged me so much that I admittedly turned it off after an hour. If Ustinov wasn't the perfect Poirot, he was still enjoyable, Branagh doesn't even seem to remotely grasp the character.
The entire movie was off. Chalk that up to forced wokeness.

Nothing beats David Suchet and his version of Death on the Nile is fantastic. No, it doesn't have the star power of the 78 version or the budget, but it's really good. Plus it's missing Mia Farrow, who's not an actress I admire.

9:23 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Newer›  ‹Older