Happy Halloween
Happy Halloween!
Happy Halloween!
As longtime readers may be aware, the original version of ANGEL AND THE BADMAN (1947) is not just my favorite John Wayne film, it's high on my list of all-time favorite movies.As the film begins, Quirt Evans (Levi), carrying ill-gotten gold pieces, is on the run from the law in the form of Marshal McLintock (Jones).
Though shot, Quirt escapes arrest and manages to ride onto the Worth family's ranch, where he collapses.
I'll insert that there were some differences from the original movie right off the bat, deleting the father character from the 1947 version and inserting a grandmother instead. Another change is that the Worths are Christians but not Quakers, which impacts the evolution of the story in the new version.
Also, I don't believe Mrs. Worth had a first name in the original film, so I think it's logical to assume that giving her the name Irene this time around was a tribute to the original actress, Irene Rich.
Continuing on regarding the plot, once he's recovered Quirt plans on leaving the Worth ranch, yet finds himself a bit reluctant to actually do so. When he intervenes with the Worths' neighbor Frederick Carson (John Pyper-Ferguson) and induces him to stop damming up water, the local community shows Quirt their appreciation by presenting him with a Bible.Quirt feels a bit trapped, especially as he's a wanderer yet attracted to pretty Penny, but with his enemy, the violent Laredo (Neil McDonough), threatening the Worths his plans to move on change...and Marshal McClintock is also keeping his eye on Quirt.
Although like many film fans I grumble about remakes, wishing for more original stories, it's ironic I've enjoyed multiple remakes this year, including this one. As stated above, a well-done Western is always welcome. I appreciated that the script followed the broad outline of the original, with some specific scenes aligning very closely, while it's also different enough to feel like an original spin.The theme of Penny simultaneously taming a wild horse is a bit too on the nose; my only other complaint is that the final sequence, in which Laredo clearly attends to attack Penny, is more troubling than I would have liked. (And for that matter, I didn't need to see Laredo's scars!)
Penny and her family initially deal with Laredo and his gang with prayer and kindness, but as they're not Quakers, violence is on the table too. Ironically this takes away some of the unique Quirt-Penny conflicts from the original film, making it a bit more of a standard Western, although the respectful treatment of Christianity as a normal part of family and community life is welcome.Levi is both believeable and appealing as Quirt; we see his struggles as a man on a knife edge who has clearly done bad things and could continue on...or not. Fraser's appeal as the forthright, gutsy Penny makes it believable he could change his ways.
Among the supporting cast, Jones is as perfect as Marshal McClintock as one would expect, and his casting is one of the reasons to see the film. McDonough is very effective as the threatening Laredo and makes the stakes very real. It's a long way from McDonough's genial performance as Marvel's Dum Dum Dugan, one of the "Howling Commandos."
ANGEL AND THE BADMAN was directed by Julio Quintana and filmed by Alex Quintana.Parental Advisory: This film is rated PG-13. Although not graphic, Laredo kills a number of people and intends to do more bad things as the movie comes to a climax. PG-13 seems about right to me, all things considered.
Here is the trailer.
For additional thoughts on this film, please see Rachel's review at Hamlette's Soliloquy.
Coming soon: A review of the latest version of Jane Austen's SENSE AND SENSIBILITY (2026).
Post
Close to 16 years ago I reviewed THE SOCIAL NETWORK (2010), about the founding of Facebook.I found THE SOCIAL NETWORK absorbing, if unmoving, and I felt much the same when I returned to it for a fresh watch last week. It plays like a nerdy DALLAS, with no one particularly sympathetic.
The impetus for my rewatch of THE SOCIAL NETWORK was the new film THE SOCIAL RECKONING (2026), which revisits Facebook 16 years on.
Like the original film, THE SOCIAL RECKONING was written by Aaron Sorkin; this time around he also directed. The previous film was directed by David Fincher.
I saw THE SOCIAL RECKONING "cold," so I had little idea what the specific subject matter would be, and it was initially hard to get a foothold on where the movie was going due to the nonlinear storytelling.Gradually the plot sharpens into focus: An unhappy young Facebook employee, Frances Haugen (Mikey Madison), doesn't like the way the company's algorithms are driving "extremism," so she eventually leaks information on the issue to a Wall Street Journal reporter, Jeff Horwitz (Jeremy Allen White).
Over time, and in violation of her nondisclosure agreement with her employer, Frances leaks more and more documentation to Horwitz, who writes a series of articles on Facebook's algorithms.Simultaneously there are internal debates between Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg (Jeremy Strong) and his ex-colleague Charlie (Bill Burr) about censorship, with Zuckerberg an advocate for free speech and Charlie coming down on the side of "fact checking," meaning censoring what's allowed to be published on the site.
Frances ultimately evades legal prosecution by claiming whistleblower status and testifying to Congress, while Horwitz wins a Pulitzer for its columns. And Facebook continues on.
I found this 112-minute film interesting enough to be worth seeing, yet uneven. THE SOCIAL NETWORK also bounded back and forth in time, but in a more coherent fashion. In the case of THE SOCIAL RECKONING, it was unclear where the story was even heading for a good half hour.The movie's decision to spend most of its time centered on a flatly unlikeable character, Frances, was certainly a choice. Whether or not one agrees with her concerns and/or ethics, Frances is an unhappy young woman; she even comments while watching a basketball game that she's never felt as happy as a player she sees on the TV screen.
Frances is hyperworried, both about Facebook and her response to how the company is run; she repeatedly claims to love her job, but she doesn't demonstrate it. Moreover, there seems to be nothing or no one in her life other than her job worries and her ongoing struggle with celiac disease.I'm unfamiliar with Madison's work, though she recently won an Oscar for ANORA (2024), and her flat, uninteresting performance frankly doesn't cause me to have an interest in her future work.
White, on the other hand, has some real snap and vigor in his sympathetic portrayal of the Wall Street Journal reporter; without him the movie would have sunk. I did find his character's snobbery about the need for journalistic credentials annoying, but for the most part the character was engaging, reasonable, and incredibly patient dealing with the annoying Frances.
One of the things I appreciate about Aaron Sorkin's scripts is that even when I don't agree with his -- or his characters' -- points of view, they entertain and drive thoughtful discussion. And as someone firmly in the freedom of speech camp, I found myself pleasantly surprised by the inclusion of fairly balanced debates between Zuckerberg and his ex-friend on that issue.
That said, some important points were left out, i.e., was/is Facebook simply a "common carrier" platform for others' speech, or did it have the right, or even responsibility, to determine its own facts and silence those points it didn't agree with, sometimes in the name of shutting down "extremism"?I was also annoyed by the film's unquestioning acceptance that social media debate over the handling of COVID, and especially vaccinations, was problematic. As someone who was among those injured by the COVID vaccine, I'd suggest the healthiest thing would have been much more extensive debate and free discussion on these issues, and that's all I'll say on that topic.
Among the supporting cast I was entertained by Betty Gilpin as one of Horwitz's superiors at the Wall Street Journal, though in her own way her social interactions were as unhealthy as Zuckerberg's. If the real people portrayed here truly acted as depicted, one has to wonder about the lack of maturity in dealing with others. Yet these people, at the top of major media and social media companies, are ruling our world?!THE SOCIAL RECKONING was filmed by Jeff Cronenweth, who also filmed the earlier movie.
Coming soon: A review of another new film, ANGEL AND THE BADMAN (1947), which loosely remakes a favorite John Wayne title. (Update: Here is my review of ANGEL AND THE BADMAN.)
It's been a very hectic time here since returning from the TCM Classic Cruise last week, but hopefully things are now starting to settle down!
An engaging musical from Paramount Pictures, RHYTHM ON THE RIVER (1940), was just released on Blu-ray by Universal.John Scott Trotter and Ken Carpenter turn up in entertaining roles late in the film, playing a band leader and radio announcer, which is fun given that both men actually worked with Crosby on the radio.
RHYTHM ON THE RIVER was previously released on multiple DVDs, including a 2017 Universal Vault Series DVD. It also came out on a VHS tape back in 1994.
The Blu-ray print is for the most part quite good, if just a bit too grainy at a couple points, with some mild damage also occasionally apparent. That said, overall this is a nice-looking disc with adequate sound; more work could have been done on both aspects, but it's an entirely enjoyable watch and I'm glad to have this film available on Blu-ray.Like many other Universal Blu-ray releases, there are no extras on the disc, but optional English captions are provided.
Thanks to Allied Vaughn and Universal for providing a review copy of this Blu-ray. It may be ordered from Movie Zyng, Amazon, and other online retailers.
Post
...will not appear this weekend, as I'm on the TCM Classic Cruise.
GIDEON'S DAY (1958), known in the U.S. as GIDEON OF SCOTLAND YARD, is just the kind of film I like: A "day in the life" police procedural featuring Jack Hawkins in almost every scene.